The Digital Complication
← Back to the piece The Addiction Factory About

I Invited Nobody

Live experiment — Documenting algorithmic targeting in real time

On 27 March 2026, I created a Facebook business page. I posted some work. I did not invite a single person. I did not share it to my personal profile. I did not follow anyone. I did not pay for promotion. I told no one it existed.

The algorithm delivered views anyway.

This page documents what happened. It updates over time with real data. If Facebook's algorithm actively pushes a small web design page from Ramsbottom to strangers who never asked for it, the question is simple: what does it do to a teenager?

The Rules
Conditions of the Experiment
Controlled from day one. No promotion of any kind.
Rule 01
Zero invitations
Not a single person was invited to like or follow the page. The "Invite Friends" button was never pressed.
Rule 02
Zero personal sharing
No posts were shared to any personal profile, group, or messenger conversation. The page exists in isolation.
Rule 03
Zero paid promotion
No money was spent. No boosted posts. No ads. No "Promote Page" button. Nothing.
Rule 04
Zero follows
The page did not follow other pages. No engagement bait. No like-for-like. No community seeding.
Rule 05
Zero external links
No links to the Facebook page were placed on any website, email signature, or other social platform.
Rule 06
Content posted organically
Posts are examples of client work. A small business sharing what they do. Nothing designed to go viral.
The Data
What Happened
Live timeline. Updated with real screenshots and numbers.
27 March 2026 — Day 1
Page created
Facebook business page goes live. First post: a video of recent client work. No invitations sent. No shares. No promotion of any kind.
Followers
0
Invitations Sent
0
Money Spent
£0
29 March 2026 — Day 3
Views appear
Without any promotion, the page has received views. The algorithm found people and showed them the content. Nobody asked for it. Nobody searched for it. The machine decided they should see it.
Followers
0
Page Views
~100
Invitations Sent
0
Money Spent
£0
8 April 2026 — Week 1
First weekly check
Twelve days in. One follower has appeared - somebody the algorithm nudged into following a page they were never told about. 158 page views from zero promotion. Facebook reports 4 engagements, but clicking through shows nothing. Ghost metrics. Numbers without evidence. Even the dashboard is a complication.
Followers
1
Page Views
158
Engagements
4
Invitations Sent
0
Money Spent
£0
Demographics
Hidden
19 April 2026 — Week 3
199 views. Still nobody invited.
Twenty-three days in. No new posts since the last checkpoint. No new follows. No new activity of any kind. The page has been completely dormant. The views climbed anyway. 199 now, up from 158. The algorithm is resurfacing old content to new strangers without any signal from the page owner at all. Demographics remain hidden behind Meta's minimum threshold. But the content breakdown tells a story: reels account for 68.3% of reach, photos 25.1%. The algorithm rewards video. It always rewards video. Time on platform is the metric. A photo takes two seconds. A reel takes thirty. The machine knows what it wants.
Here is the number that matters: 86.4% of the people seeing this content are non-followers. People who never asked for it, never searched for it, never heard of it. Shown content from a page that hasn't even posted anything new. The algorithm chose them. Not me. Not them. It.
One more detail. Facebook sends emails to the page owner: your page is being viewed. No detail. No breakdown. Just a link back to the platform. The algorithm pushes dormant content to strangers to generate views, then uses those views to pull the page owner back in. Both sides of the equation are being targeted. The viewers didn't ask to see the content. The owner didn't ask to be notified. The only beneficiary is the platform.
Followers
1
Page Views
199
Non-Followers Reached
86.4%
Top Content Type
Reels (68.3%)
Invitations Sent
0
Money Spent
£0
Demographics
Still hidden
3 May 2026 — Day 37
206 views. Page dormant for 36 days.
The page has not posted anything since 28 March. No new content. No new follows. No activity of any kind for thirty-six days. The views still climbed. 206 now, up from 199. Seven more strangers were shown content from a page that has been completely silent for over five weeks. The algorithm does not need the page owner to participate. It serves what it wants, when it wants, to whoever it decides.
The 28-day window tells the sharpest story: in the most recent month, 100% of people reached were non-followers. Not 86%. Not 90%. Every single person who saw this content was a stranger who never asked for it, never followed the page, never searched for it. The algorithm chose all of them.
One more detail. Facebook displayed a banner in the dashboard this month: "Views data affected for 1-4 April 2026. Views data may be undercounted." Their own numbers cannot be trusted. They told us so themselves. The real total is higher than 206. We will never know by how much.
Followers
1
Page Views
206
Non-Followers Reached (28-day)
100%
Non-Followers Reached (Lifetime)
86.9%
Top Content Type
Reels (69.4%)
Days Since Last Post
36
Invitations Sent
0
Money Spent
£0
Views Data Reliable?
No
27 May 2026 — Month 2
Two months. Still nobody invited.
Two months of algorithmic targeting documented. The question gets louder.
The Point
Scale This
If it targets a web designer, imagine what it does to a child.
This experiment
206
Views in 37 days for a dormant small business page from Ramsbottom that nobody was told about. 100% of recent views were non-followers. The page hasn't posted in 36 days.
What Meta built
3.07bn
Monthly active users, March 2026. Each one shown content chosen by the algorithm, not by them.
The algorithm doesn't wait to be asked.

My page has one follower I never invited. I invited nobody. I spent nothing. The content is unremarkable - a small business sharing its work. The page hasn't posted anything in over five weeks. There is no reason for anyone to see it.

But the algorithm showed it to people anyway. It decided who should see it. Not them. Not me. It.

Now consider this: the same algorithm manages what 3 billion people see every day. It optimises for engagement - time on platform. It doesn't distinguish between a web design portfolio and content that triggers eating disorders, self-harm, or radicalisation. It only knows what keeps people scrolling.

In March 2026, a Los Angeles jury found Meta and YouTube liable for intentionally building platforms that addicted a young woman who started using Instagram aged nine. She used it for 16 hours in a single day. The head of Instagram called that "problematic".

I invited nobody. They came anyway. She was nine. The algorithm came for her too.

←
Previous
The Silencing
They were found liable. Then they silenced the lawyers.
Next
Do You Really Think You're In Control?
The way out.
→